(Copy and paste this tedious prolisseide the facebook note written on the eve of the Democratic Party primary. I do not want to amend my hasty judgments. Just to say that I only give moral blackmail on the cock, pace of leonardo and his enthusiasm.)
Then, I read this stuff here and I said come on, I've had time to lose too much, let's analyze stammerda point by point, just in time for the end of the campaign.
Topic: Democratic Party primaries.
Question:
Why do not you will vote in the primaries?
1) 'Why are not the Democratic Party " This has all the appearance of being good response, but Gilioli says no, if we want to "send home the crack of the Knight also serves as a strong opposition party the Democratic Party." A lot of the crap
The point is that you ask the people (voters apparently left the defunct rainbow, or even more likely to Di Pietro) choose to go to the secretary of a party who did not vote and / or did not intend to vote elections. And why? Why is it necessary that a strong party to oppose the rider. Oh well ', it makes perfect sense. If all this People feel the need to fight the knight but votes elsewhere, obviously its need is already satisfied by the parties that vote and the Democratic Party does not feel the need, especially if it presents itself as an opposition party with no hope of governing. It would make more sense of the request "you too become the Democratic Party, who govern, and thus thrown Abberlustoni Tuttinsieme" instead of this absurd request. What interest would, for example, a voter IDV, which was heard several times just sfanculare by members of the Democratic Party, to make stronger what is already the strongest opposition party? Obviously, no.
But it is equally obvious that this request insensata non è diretta né a quelli della Sinistra Arcobaleno (sorry guyz, non vi s’incula più nessuno, ovunque voi siate) né a quelli dell’IdV. È una mano tesa ai democristiani, e a loro soli: mi sbaglio? Per gli altri è solo un “cacciami il soldino, grazie per il tuo tempo e adesso tornatene pure affanculo”.
(*) cosa che non ha nemmeno più necessità di fare, dal momento che, davanti alla ghiotta prospettiva di farlo cadere sullo scudo fiscale, si sono dati alla macchia.
2) «Perché il Pd fa schifo» Pure questa risposta non sta bene a Gilioli, ma è un giudizio “diffuso tra quelli che vorrebbero a party and not a real ectoplasm, "and according to him" a low turnout in the primaries would make it even more ectoplasmic and weak. " First, if you think that the Democratic Party sucks to make it stronger then I do not give much: the problem of this party, who gives this answer, it's not that weak, but that just sucks, two very different things. If it sucks now that he is weak and "baby" (the new spreads, baf!), How to make it stronger difettuccio should correct this? Answer: NOT RECEIVED. Gilioli also insinuates that "with few voters in the primaries the Democratic Party would be even more disgusting, and its equipment would make meat Pig. " Evidently believes that the same equipment that produced the candidate of the primaries, impressed by a high turnout, the electorate would feel his breath on my neck and would thus be compelled to toe the line. Shit, this is indeed a compelling logic, so why not cut the head of the bull and all vote for the PDL, as well Abberlusconi feel intimidated by this overwhelming consensus? It makes sense to vote for those who are not exactly what inspires no confidence, after all.
3) "Why is it better than Peter" "legal opinion" Bontàsua Gilioli says, "but never IDV alone shall not constitute an alternative to Berlusconi: you can imagine but only with a strong Democratic Party. "And why not with a robust IdV to say? If we make a strong enough any party not in government, after all, we are creating a strong opposition to the PDL, what is missing in these arguments is the answer to the question: why the Democratic Party? Ideas that I convey to the Democratic Party said an alternative to Berlusconi better than that offered by anyone else? But the need for this Pd is given as an axiom, then do ALL THESE QUESTIONS I waste my time.
4) "Because so much is good for nothing" Here they are, the usual defeatist! Also give up the hope of a better world without Abberlustoni, also give up eating and breathe and key because both the sun and the universe will implode off, well done, do something like that you are already DEAD INSIDE! Well not necessarily serve in some way but we groped, otherwise you are not the Italy that he loves me! Well, aside from the fact that there has already tried several times and the result has been precisely the equivalent of a kayak that precipitates a cascade of cagarella assholes for breaking up rocks hard and sharp, that things will be different this time I you have to prove, Pd, you can not hope you think about the word. The first time you came to power as a good left have invented the modern and dynamic insecurity, laying the groundwork for future full and systematic destruction of any hope and life planning for people of my generation (no, blame the right to have it even worse does not work: it was the right one would expect this kind of reform, YOU NO, that's where is the difference), the second time you put Mastella Justice and released by the infamous pardon, thousands of murderers, thieves, rapists (all then went back inside after committing other crimes that simply would not have been if you had not given birth to this crap) in agreement with the PDL. In short, do not you give me one reason to believe that the Democratic Party is an alternative to the right, and if I feel that these are useless antics of primary are also "the italiachenonvuolebene. But go a bit 'to fuck up as good.
5) "Because I do not like any of the three candidates' ... but it is better than any of their Abberlustoni, no? And to say a few words to explain why this rather than take it for granted, when? Suppose one considers a time of global economic crisis requires a stable government even shitty (again using the logic of "lesser evil" at the base of everything) and find that the largest opposition party in Italy, given its recent history of internal strife and inability to make a decision clear and shared, does not meet this requirement, what? It could possibly purge the Democratic Party, after the primaries, all those who are against in order to support the positions clear and shared (hint. BINETTI OUTSIDE THE SHIT TO DO ON STAGE-DIVING artichokes, to name one at random). Here, however controversial, this may be a valid justification for a fool like me by chance, say "ah crap, but even if we do we are the power rangers and we are good" no. It takes for granted that anyone is better than SB, and it is assumed that anyone claiming one of these will strengthen the party and suddenly take the sharper edges, as if a strong leader in the Democratic Party could actually intimidate the leaders of these movements and make them "fall into line." Well, I do not think so. Neither Prodi, who won the election twice, he succeeded. Then we want to point out how foolish to pull out the argument "yes, but anyone is better than the head of PDL" when it comes to choosing the leader of the Democratic Party and not that of the PDL? Yes, come on, let's see.
6) "Why are all bastards (those of Pd) ' Gilioli trivially says that" there are not assholes and jerks, as in all or most of the organizations "(note the" almost "eh, this is class guys, we must stand to think a bit 'up, but deemed say that there are also some free shit or embody the ultimate evil, Cthulhu's army came from the bottom of the abyss to enslave humanity?), and that "probably the Democratic Party as a whole to be less asshole the PDL. " The point is, the coefficient of shit in the Democratic Party is likely to induce me to prefer the idea of planting red-hot forks into the scrotum, rather than vote, or not? The question is not trivial, since the turnout has been increasing, as is the League. Perhaps many have decided to vote instead of Pd alloy, for example. Or maybe the Democratic Party has crossed the line with baciapile, and flagellating monks fucking doctors objectors consciousness leaving the FUCKING WALL.
7) "Why the Democratic Party does not give any trouble for Berlusconi" here recognizes that "indeed, so far, the Democratic Party did not give much trouble for Berlusconi," but that "whoever is elected, we will stand with the breathing down your neck because they do not repeat the painful experiences of the past. " And why, pray, to reward a party going to vote in its primary would bring in 3 million to correct the course and not to repeat the painful experiences of the past? To me it sounds more like "good guys keep it up you going strong! Continue to quietly note that in moderately wrong on some issues, the Knight! Ditegliene four Ballarò "You know a great way to force a party to change course? Punishing boycott the polls.
8) "What's the big win D'Alema, who is a inciucione, and these primaries are a farce" The counter argument is that "even if he won Bersani, the greater will be the result of the other two candidates more difficult it is for D 'Alema retry old mess-ups. "Oh yeah? And how, teleporting him and all his power in the middle of the Indian Ocean? Continue to exist even after the primaries, or plan to use Franceschini unorthodox methods to get rid of dissidents?
said that, to say a few words about these primaries. Recently I read (can not remember the details at the moment) that a candidate has complained of as many posters that come with one of the other, and that it was not correct. A level playing field within the party. Christ. Whomsoever imbecillone obviously has no idea how they work in the U.S. primaries. There not only the candidates and their staff must bump going around the U.S. for months, but must also convince donors to hunt the fine grain to support their election campaign (in exchange for political support and reforms they must ensure an economic return, of course, that mica do it for sympathy: it is a investment, it comes to election campaigns by hundreds of millions of dollars, eh). It is not that they are to get rolling and rubbing the balls to each other, but to take blows on the gums for several months, the newspapers disgraced opponent, pulled off dirty stories that were believed buried in a nutshell play very dirty. Here is the campaign of the fantastic heroes of democracy is to use different intonation to give him to Berlusconi, and needless to talk about it blows on the gums. Where was the bloody struggle between these internal factions of the Democratic Party? These are not the primary, this is the game of three cards.
9) "Why the Democratic Party did not make the law on conflict interest "by Well, it can happen to anyone to get distracted, you do take too much on sunscreen and after sun from slippers to pack, then you get on the road and the toll-to '! we forgot the gas on, damn! One you take too much work and this is nothing like that hey, it's already 2001 and there are new elections, luckily we were able to introduce at least for the time Treu package in order to make the labor market more liquid and up to date, in line with the new left-liberal Western! Of course, now we are not like the government when we could really do it, the law, but if you will help to strengthen the Largest Opposition Party be assured that we will shit blood, Abberlusconi! Whatever drives us a little bit every now and then, or else that passes through his mind. Oh well, 'row which is a beauty.
Small side note: that Berlusconi owns a big chunk of information and almost all the tv is a fact, that people who voted did so under pressure with their guns in the neck is rather obvious bullshit. So much so that not everyone will vote, and it is useless you are to soak up the fact that people with the brain is on one side and all the other Obtuse stupid couch potatoes. The fact is that there are elections, these elections and Berlusconi wins. The motivations that drive people to vote is the average stupid everywhere, because stupidity (as we are taught the essential Carlo Maria Cipolla) is well distributed to all levels of society: the stupidity is neither necessary nor sufficient condition to explain the loyalty that people give to Berlusconi since he came into politics, perhaps other reasons should be sought, perhaps seeking the reasons for the distrust of voters against it in its past operations. But no, why, the better to pose as champions of freedom of information, law and equality, so that it fields the same. Let TURQUOISE SOCKS ALL OF FREEDOM '!
The power of influence of the media could discuss long, but that the success of SB is due solely to them is just not facing reality. Shut up And a good time to mention the foreign press, the god Cthulhu, who have broken with the balls I'm fucking Times of London: the indignation of the foreign press is irrelevant when it comes to the polls HERE IN ITALY, not the British to vote and will not be the British to unseat Berlusconi, unless you want to try a landing in Sicily. Schiaffatevelo in the fucking head.
10) "For those of Pd are weak and absent" argument: "True, very true." Ok, no objection. Following the usual tirade about the fact that poor people, we need an injection of self-esteem, go to vote then you dislike, are in a crisis of personality, Bersani is cut to feel alive, boredom and balls. Yawn.
Well, that's all.
0 comments:
Post a Comment